

Trusted Austin Police Brutality Lawyers
When law enforcement officers violate your constitutional rights through excessive force, unlawful arrest, or other forms of misconduct, the consequences can be devastating. Police brutality doesn't just cause physical injuries — it destroys trust, traumatizes victims, and undermines the very principles of justice our society depends on.
If you've been the victim of police misconduct in Austin or Central Texas, you need attorneys who aren't afraid to take on these massive institutions and hold them accountable. The Austin police brutality lawyers at Smith & Vinson bring decades of combined experience fighting for the rights of Texans when they need it most, and we can do the same for you. As former prosecutors, we understand how the system works from the inside, and we use that knowledge to build compelling cases against officers and departments who violate citizens' rights.
Police brutality cases require attorneys with the resources, experience, and determination to go head-to-head with well-funded government entities. Call the Austin civil rights lawyers at Smith & Vinson today at 512-368-9044 to put an advocate in your corner.
What are your rights during interactions with the police?
Understanding your constitutional rights during police encounters is the first step towards protecting yourself and building a strong case if those rights, that cannot be taken away, are violated. Every citizen has fundamental protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, regardless of the circumstances of a police interaction.
- Your Fourth Amendment rights protect you from unreasonable searches and seizures. Police cannot search your person, vehicle, or property without a warrant, probable cause, or your voluntary consent. They must have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to detain you, and that suspicion must be based on specific, articulable facts, not hunches or profiling.
- Your Fifth Amendment rights include the right to remain silent and the right against self-incrimination. You are not required to answer questions beyond providing basic identification information when legally detained. You can clearly state, "I am respectfully exercising my right to remain silent" and request an attorney.
- Your First Amendment rights protect your freedom of speech and the right to record police interactions in public spaces. You have the right to observe and document police activity as long as you don't interfere with their duties.
- Protection from excessive force is guaranteed under the Constitution. Police may only use the amount of force that is reasonable and necessary under the circumstances. The use of force must be proportional to the threat posed and the severity of the suspected crime.
- Due process rights ensure that you cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without proper legal procedures. This includes the right to a fair hearing, adequate notice of charges, and protection from arbitrary government action.
When police violate any of these rights, you may have grounds for a civil rights lawsuit. The Austin police brutality attorneys at Smith & Vinson thoroughly investigate every aspect of your interaction with law enforcement to identify where constitutional violations happened and build a strong case for justice.
Types of police misconduct
Police misconduct encompasses a wide range of illegal actions by law enforcement officers that can violate your constitutional rights. Some more common examples of police misconduct include:
- Excessive force is the most recognized form of police brutality. This occurs when officers use more force than reasonably necessary to accomplish a lawful purpose. Examples include beatings, chokeholds, tasering without justification, or using deadly force when non-lethal alternatives were available.
- False arrest and unlawful detention happen when police arrest or detain someone without probable cause or reasonable suspicion. Officers cannot arrest individuals based on personal bias, insufficient evidence, or fabricated charges. Prolonged detention without proper justification also violates constitutional rights.
- Illegal search and seizure violations occur when police search people, vehicles, or property without warrants, probable cause, or valid exceptions to the warrant requirement. This includes planted evidence, unauthorized home searches, and invasive body searches without justification.
- Sexual misconduct by police officers represents one of the most serious forms of abuse. This includes sexual assault, harassment, inappropriate touching during searches, or coercing sexual favors in exchange for leniency.
- Malicious prosecution involves officers knowingly pursuing criminal charges without probable cause or fabricating evidence to support prosecutions. This can destroy lives through wrongful convictions and imprisonment.
- Failure to intervene occurs when officers witness misconduct by their colleagues but fail to stop it or report it. Officers have a legal duty to prevent constitutional violations when they have the opportunity to do so.
- Discriminatory policing includes racial profiling, targeting individuals based on protected characteristics, and unequal enforcement of laws based on race, religion, national origin, or other protected status.
What evidence is needed to win a police brutality case?
Successful police brutality cases require compelling evidence that clearly demonstrates constitutional violations. The strength of your evidence often determines both the likelihood of success and the potential compensation available.
- Video evidence is often the most powerful tool in police misconduct cases. Body camera footage, dashboard recordings, surveillance video, and bystander cell phone recordings provide objective documentation of events.
- Medical documentation establishes the extent of injuries and connects them to police actions. Detailed medical records, photographs of injuries, and expert medical testimony help demonstrate the severity of harm and the unreasonableness of force used.
- Witness testimony from independent observers can corroborate your account and challenge police narratives. We identify and interview all potential witnesses, including bystanders, other officers who may be willing to testify, and expert witnesses who can explain police procedures and constitutional standards.
- Police reports and internal documents often contain inconsistencies that support misconduct claims. We examine incident reports, internal affairs investigations, officer disciplinary records, and training materials to identify problems with the official narrative.
- Pattern evidence demonstrates systemic problems within police departments. If other officers or the same officer have histories of misconduct, this evidence can support claims of inadequate training, supervision, or department policies that enable violations.
- Physical evidence can include damaged property, weapons used, and forensic evidence that contradicts police accounts.
Building a strong evidentiary foundation is often the determining factor in police misconduct cases, but evidence disappears fast. The sooner you contact our Austin police brutality lawyers, the better we can preserve crucial evidence and build your case.
How much can you sue for police brutality?
Victims of police brutality may be entitled to damages for the police violations from which they’ve suffered. The amount of damages depends on the severity of the misconduct, the extent of your injuries, and the long-term impact on your life — but compensation in police brutality cases is often significant.
Some damages that may be available to you include:
Type of damage | Intention of compensation | May include |
Economic damages | Measurable financial losses |
|
Non-economic damages | Less tangible harm |
|
Punitive damages | Designed to punish wrongdoers |
|
The value of police brutality cases varies widely based on specific circumstances — minor misconduct cases might result in settlements of thousands of dollars, while severe cases can result in multi-million-dollar awards.
Our Austin police brutality attorneys work with economists, medical experts, and life care planners to accurately calculate the full value of your damages and ensure you receive fair compensation for all harm suffered.
How long after police brutality can you sue?
The statute of limitations for police brutality cases in Texas can vary depending on the type of claim you pursue, but it is generally two years from the date of the misconduct. The two-year deadline applies for both state and federal police brutality claims, but those timelines can be shorter against government entities and in a few other situations — so you’ve got to move fast.
Time is always of the essence in police brutality cases, not just because of legal deadlines but also because evidence disappears and witnesses' memories fade. We recommend contacting us immediately after any incident of police misconduct to help ensure your rights are fully protected, evidence in your case is preserved, and all important deadlines are met.
What to look for in lawyers that sue police departments in Texas
Choosing the right attorney for your police brutality case can make the difference between justice and disappointment. Police misconduct cases are complex, resource-intensive, and require specialized knowledge and experience that many attorneys lack.
- Civil rights experience is essential because police brutality law is highly specialized. Look for attorneys who regularly handle Section 1983 cases and have deep knowledge of constitutional law, qualified immunity doctrine, and federal civil rights procedures.
- Trial experience matters because police departments are more likely to settle cases fairly when they know your attorneys are prepared and capable of winning at trial. Many civil rights cases settle, but the best settlements come when defendants respect your lawyers' courtroom skills.
- Resources and support are necessary for taking on well-funded government entities. Police departments have unlimited taxpayer resources for defense. Your attorneys need the financial resources to conduct thorough investigations, retain expert witnesses, and pursue lengthy litigation if necessary.
- A record of success at trial demonstrates proven ability to achieve results. Look for attorneys who have secured significant settlements and verdicts in cases similar to yours, not just general personal injury lawyers.
At Smith & Vinson, we meet all these criteria and more. Our combination of prosecutorial experience, trial success, and commitment to civil rights makes us the trusted choice for police brutality victims throughout Austin and Central Texas.
Fight back with the Police misconduct lawyers in Austin at Smith & Vinson
When police violate your constitutional rights, fighting back isn't just about seeking compensation — it's about holding powerful institutions accountable and preventing future abuses. At Smith & Vinson, we believe that every victim of police misconduct deserves justice, regardless of their background or the circumstances of their case.
Our founders, Jarrod L. Smith and Brad Vinson, are notorious trial attorneys who understand how law enforcement and government entities operate from the inside. Their experience gives them insights into police procedures, evidence gathering, and the institution that often protects officers from accountability — and helps them build cases that stand up to it.
If you've been the victim of police brutality in Austin or anywhere in Central Texas, don't let the violation of your rights go unanswered. Call Smith & Vinson today at 512-368-9044 or contact us online to start fighting back.

Our Client Reviews
Earning Our Reputation by Protecting Yours
-
Smith and Vinson are absolutely incredible! They go above and beyond to help their clients and have a track record of success in getting cases dismissed. Their aggressive approach and unwavering dedication make them stand out from the rest.- Linda W.
-
What sets this firm apart is their unwavering dedication to their clients. They listen attentively, provide clear guidance, and approach every case with the utmost diligence. Their attention to detail is truly impressive, and they leave no stone unturned.- Former Client
-
When in battle you need people by your side who are fierce enough to face the opposition with you. Brad and Jarod far exceeded my expectations with their passion for winning and attention to detail.- Nikki C.
-
After the Jury was selected, the first witness was called to the stand, and Brad and Jarrod imploded the State's case. Moments later, the case was dismissed. I couldn't be any more thankful for Smith & Vinson.- Former Client

A Proven Track Record
Check Out Our Recent Case Results
-
Not Guilty 2nd DWI
911 caller reported a major rollover, single car accident. EMS and fire arrived on scene. They had to break the window to get our client out of the car. He said he had swerved to miss a deer and had been up close to 18 hours before the crash. Police later arrived on scene, spoke to our client and he admitted to coming from a bar and drinking 2 martinis.
-
Not Guilty 2nd DWI
Our client was pulled over for a traffic violation. Officer smelled alcohol, client admitted to consuming a few drinks. Officer also noted slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. Client performed the SFST’s (roadside tests). Officer said he failed all 3, eye test, walk and turn and one-leg stand. Officer placed client under arrest and asked him for a sample of breath and/or blood. Client refused. Officer did not get a blood warrant.
-
Case Dismissed 2nd DWI
Our client was involved in a vehicle accident in La Grange where she was ejected from the vehicle and had to stay in the hospital. There was alcohol in the car, and she had prior DWIs. The ethanol levels in her blood came back at a .13 so she was charged with Driving While Intoxicated. This client was unaware that she was charged after she left the hospital which resulted in the charge of Bail Jumping. However she maintained that she had only an 8% functioning liver due and upon researching her medical hist
-
Deferred Adjudication Aggravated Assault & Tampering with Evidence
Our client was involved in a verbal dispute that turned into an altercation where a firearm was discharged into the ground. The round ricocheted and grazed a party to the dispute. Our client was facing multiple felony convictions and a prison sentence.
-
Deferred Adjudication Aggravated Assault Family Violence w/ Serious Bodily Injury
Our client was involved in a domestic altercation that resulted in one of the parties sustaining a very serious life -altering injury that required serious medical intervention. We took the case and approached our defense with heavy strong willed negotiations with the State.
-
Rejected Pre-Indictment Aggravated Assault Strangulation/Impeding Airway Investigation
